# Flawed Governance

**URL:** <https://discuss.jup.ag/t/flawed-governance/38575>\
**Category:** $JUP\
**Tags:** risk, dao-processes\
**Created:** [June 6, 2025, 7:03am UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/flawed-governance/38575 "2025-06-06T07:03:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matador](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/user_avatar/discuss.jup.ag/matador/32/5437_2.png) [@Matador](https://discuss.jup.ag/u/Matador)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2025, 11:25am UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/flawed-governance/38575/4 "2025-06-06T11:25:51Z")

</div>

There is no governance, I don’t understand why this vote even existed if the team would interfere in it. Putting something for “community” to decide when in reality they are deciding for community

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/flawed-governance/38575)._