The Jupiary 3 and 4 was promise to the Comunity long time ago before Stakers came on Jupiter after Behind all this proposals are the Stakers.They came on Jupiter because of the ASR…The ASR is coming from the traders fees and activity.Now the Stakers put the eye on Jupiary…All this mess is happening’s because of Stakers…NOW they want the Jupiary ffor themselfs like hungry greedy WOLFS
1 Like
Where did i say i want this to turn into stake ponzi lol
I said that Jupuary has to happen since it was promised to happen instead of we having to vote for it
1 Like
90 percent of participants in DAO voted Yes less then 10 percent which is Whales stalkers voted No because they want to manipulate the Jupiarry.Why it didn’t pass then???
1 Like
The Juppiary 3and 4 was promised without any vote but the way…We should live how it’s was promised
1 Like
Because of the desire of 200 whales?
1 Like
I voted no, because we are in the middle of the end of the bull market and seeing your investment dilute a 14% it is not pretty comfortable. maybe you will need to specify when you will put all these tokens in circulation. maybe 7% in february, and 7% in may. So people can know when they need sell or buy, maybe things goes nuclear and we can tank the diluition.
1 Like
Jupiter is a Trading Dex!!traders are the core and the heart of the community !!They are millions!!they don’t need this staking!But the decisions is taken buy the stakers whales from DAO which is not in favor of traders!!I think the DAO doesn’t fulfil the interest of the community!!Just the interests of a few stakers!!Look around-Hyperliquid don’t have this whales!!The traders up there trade and flourish !!and the HYPe coin goings up!!!
3 Likes
Are you ok brother? Looking at your post history in this forum I think you may not be ok.
2 Likes
Imagine a situation where the whales migrate elsewhere. A perfect condition might be created for those whose created it to take advantage and short the coin. So everybody is important for checks and balances as well as stability of the project- both the whales and the traders
2 Likes
Those who voted no are the same guys that move their money where the money goes and they pretend that they care for the future of Jupiter, but the future of Jupiter are all of the catdets together and all of them should be fed.
3 Likes
Again, look at Hyperliquid for a recent example of a user based, community approach for allocation.
Token price performed incredibly well
Meanwhile a few stakers would like to convince the world that the Scroll approach of linear allocation and insiders is optimal
Whales want to to drain as much as possible as quickly as possible, theyll say as much when they advocate for Jupuary being essentially a stakers ASR 2.0, or cancelling it entirely and allocating more to ASR
Once they’ve collected the lions share of the yield, they will leave.
2 Likes
In my opinion the DAO should be changed.we need to cancel the system of voting points.For the future of Jupiter !!I propose that all the voting power to come not from staking but from Trading Volume!!Users with bigger volume to have more voting power !!Like this the DAO wil serve the trading community of million of traders!!and the traders will not suffer from the ambitions of a few hundred whales!!
1 Like
And ASR should be for traders the purpose is to bring more traders to Jupiter who in the future will generate income!
1 Like
Let’s say if you stake and trade you will get ASR.example -Zeta markets they use this strategy
1 Like
I think I’m gonna vote NO for jupuary just to see @Radu crying more. It’s hilarious to see you crying on every thread like your life depends on it. 
3 Likes
agree, people like him making me click on NO again kekw
“The best thing to do is to understand the rules of the game and find a way to win. Yes the game is rigged. Yes the richer always get richer. Yes the poor always gonna struggle. And that’s the way the game is set up. So you still need to find the best move on the chess board. There’s no point sitting there saying I wanna play a different game cause that’s never gonna happen.”
study this.
2 Likes
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
I don’t think the 40% down in volume is just a coincidence. Hopefully, I’m wrong.
1 Like
Who cares if the airdrop farmers leave?
2 Likes
I don’t know my friend… Staking going down, volume going down, fees paid going down. I’m pretty sure at least a couple of people care.
2 Likes
At least not the founders of the project. Use the product if it’s good, don’t do it to farm a potential airdrop. We don’t need farmers. -Meow
2 Likes