# JLP Loan Initial Parameter Recommendations and Yield Projections **URL:** \ **Category:** Risk\ **Created:** [June 2, 2025, 10:54am UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/jlp-loan-initial-parameter-recommendations-and-yield-projections/38428 "2025-06-02T10:54:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![chaoslabs](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/user_avatar/discuss.jup.ag/chaoslabs/32/4510_2.png) [@chaoslabs](https://discuss.jup.ag/u/chaoslabs)\ **Post date:** [June 2, 2025, 10:54am UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/jlp-loan-initial-parameter-recommendations-and-yield-projections/38428/1 "2025-06-02T10:54:43Z")
## Motivation The launch of JLP Loan represents a pivotal opportunity for Jupiter to extend its ecosystem’s capital efficiency by introducing a lending market purpose-built around the JLP pool. At present, a substantial portion of USDC within JLP remains idle from a capital deployment perspective, despite its utility in facilitating perpetual trading. By enabling the borrowing of this unused USDC, JLP Loan can unlock a powerful new yield stream for JLP holders while maintaining risk controls appropriate for a volatile, multi-asset-backed collateral base. This proposal seeks to define a conservative yet effective framework for the initial rollout of JLP Loan, starting with JLP deposits and USDC borrows. The goal is to generate immediate, tangible yield improvements for JLP holders while preserving the protocol’s long-term stability and solvency. Our recommendations are grounded in a data-driven approach that takes into account the historical behavior of USDC in Jupiter perps markets, the risk characteristics of JLP, and comparisons to industry-standard lending parameters across leading DeFi protocols. ## Launch Parameters The table below outlines our recommended risk parameters for the initial deployment of JLP Loan, focusing on JLP deposits and USDC borrow functionality. These recommendations are informed by a synthesis of historical USDC utilization in Jupiter’s perpetual markets, the volatility profile of the JLP asset, and benchmarking against established risk frameworks used by leading lending protocols. In the subsequent analysis, we examine historical USDC borrow APRs and utilization rates across top-tier lending platforms to estimate the incremental yield that can be driven to the Jupiter protocol and the JLP token as a result of this initiative. | **Parameter** | **Recommended Value** | **Recommendation Rationale** | | --- | --- | --- | | **borrows\_limit\_in\_bps** | **5000 bps (50%)** | USDC’s average utilization in Jupiter perps over the past 180 days was 9%, with a maximum of 21%. A borrowing limit of 5000 (50%) provides for a significant liquidity buffer relative to USDC peak utilization rates. | | **liquidation\_margin** | **8600 bps (86%)** | Set slightly above the typical LTV ratios for WBTC, WETH, and WSOL on leading DeFi lending protocols, reflecting the added risk diversification inherent in the JLP asset. | | **maintainance\_margin\_bps** | **8000 bps (80%)** | The maintenance\_margin\_bps is set at a prudent buffer above the liquidation\_margin to ensure a smoother user experience and to mitigate the risk of immediate liquidations during periods of heightened market volatility. | | **protocol\_fee\_bps** | **2500 bps (25%)** | Set equal to Jupiter’s current perpetuals fee take rate. | | **liquidation\_fee\_bps** | **600 bps (6%)** | Provides a sufficient buffer to ensure profitable native liquidations by the protocol, even in the absence of a liquidation bonus. In most cases, there is more than enough liquidity to facilitate low-fee liquidations. However, under high-utilization conditions, liquidators will not act at the recommended fee level. Moving forward, we recommend a risk oracle to dynamically incentivize liquidations. | | **min\_rate\_bps** | **0 bps (0%)** | Incentivizes borrow growth along the path to target\_utilization\_rate. | | **target\_rate\_bps** | **850 bps (8.5%)** | A competitive borrow rate compared to USDC borrowing rates on Solana. | | **max\_rate\_bps** | **1500 bps (15%)** | A relatively shallow slope allows for high direct borrowing demand even as perp traders’ borrowing increases. | | **target\_utilization\_rate** | **6000 bps (60%)** | Allowing for 50% utilization by direct USDC borrowers + 10% borrowed by perp traders. Of course, higher utilization by perp traders may take place, possibly triggering a decrease in direct USDC borrowing. | The below volatility and utilization data informed our **liquidation\_margin** and **borrows\_limit\_in\_bps** parameter recommendations, respectively. ### Annualized Volatility of Hourly Returns (last 365 days of data) The annualized standard deviation of hourly returns for JLP (virtual) is meaningfully lower than that of BTC, ETH, and SOL. | **Asset** | **Volatility** | | --- | --- | | JLP | 38.13% | | BTC | 43.38% | | ETH | 59.03% | | SOL | 75.95% | Similarly, at the P99 and P99.9 level, JLP’s absolute 1H virtual price changes are less extreme than each of the constituent volatile assets in its basket. ### Absolute Price Changes (Hourly) | **Percentile** | **JLP** | **BTC** | **ETH** | **SOL** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | P50 | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.38% | | P90 | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 1.18% | | P95 | 0.80% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.58% | | P99 | 1.49% | 1.77% | 2.24% | 2.82% | As such, we anchored JLP’s core collateralization requirements — **maintainance\_margin\_bps** and **liquidation\_margin —** above those of WBTC, WETH, and WSOL on leading DeFi lending protocols. ### Utilization Metrics USDC’s peak short utilization was 21% over the last 6 months. As such, even at **borrows\_limit\_in\_bps** 5000 (50%), perps short utilization could spike by more than 100% above its trailing 6mo high before encroaching on USDC that may be lending-utilized. A **target\_utilization\_rate** of 60% for USDC is only provided to allow for high utilization at all times, while capitalizing on high interest rates during interest rate spikes. | **Asset** | **WBTC** | **WETH** | **SOL** | **USDC** | **USDT** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Average Utilization | 39% | 7% | 21% | 9% | 0% | | Min Utilization | 19% | 5% | 15% | 2% | 0% | | Max Utilization | 95% | 52% | 100% | **21%** | 12% | | | | | | | | ## Yield Projections Over the last 12 months, Aave v3’s [USDC Ethereum Core market](https://app.aave.com/reserve-overview/?underlyingAsset=0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48&marketName=proto_mainnet_v3) — the largest USDC lending market in DeFi — has sustained an average borrow APR of 6.73%, though this rate has trended down to a relatively steady state of ~5% today. ![image (52)](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/uploads/jupresear/original/2X/b/be7dcb5cfeb3440a42cbc5c3ba5f1e3743cbdc41.png) However, on Solana, we traditionally see a higher borrowing yield on stablecoins, as can be seen on Kamino’s USDC market: ![image (51)](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/uploads/jupresear/original/2X/f/f6290024007d31c73d0195311e39246ffe9480e9.png) ### New JLP Yield Projections Table The table below shows the expected yield from direct borrowing of USDC only, not including yield from perp traders borrowing USDC under the assumption of full utilization of direct USDC borrowing at all times, i.e., 50% of the available USDC, considering the current supply of 494M USDC and the current borrowing interest rates. | **Average Utilization Rate** | **Average APR** | **Expected yield (3mo)** | **Expected yield (6mo)** | **Expected yield (1yr)** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 60% | 8.50% | 2.125% / $5.2M | 4.25% / %10.5M | 8.5% / $21M | | 70% | 9.80% | 2.45% / $6M | 4.9% / $12.1M | 9.8% / $24.2M | | 80% | 11.10% | 2.775% / $6.8M | 5.55% / $13.7M | 11.1% / $27.4M | | 90% | 12.40% | 3.1% / $7.7M | 6.2% / $15.3M | 12.4% / $30.6M | | 100% | 13.70% | 3.425% / $8.5M | 6.85% / $16.9M | 13.7% / $33.8M | ## Summary The proposed JLP Loan launch parameters are designed to unlock significant yield potential for JLP holders by safely deploying idle USDC from the JLP pool. Our recommendations are grounded in a comprehensive analysis of historical utilization patterns, risk-adjusted volatility metrics, and prevailing practices across leading DeFi lending markets. By adopting a conservative initial configuration, anchored in both quantitative rigor and market precedent, Jupiter is well-positioned to drive sustainable value accrual to the protocol and its stakeholders. As utilization scales and market conditions evolve, we anticipate opportunities to further optimize these parameters, particularly via the introduction of dynamic risk management mechanisms such as a responsive risk oracle. We invite feedback from the Jupiter community and governance participants to refine these parameters ahead of deployment, and look forward to a collaborative path toward growing JLP Loan into a core yield engine for the Jupiter ecosystem. # **Disclaimer** Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this recommendation. # **Copyright** Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain) ---
**Author:** ![Samyak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7993a0/32.png) [@Samyak](https://discuss.jup.ag/u/Samyak)\ **Post date:** [June 3, 2025, 1:11pm UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/jlp-loan-initial-parameter-recommendations-and-yield-projections/38428/2 "2025-06-03T13:11:59Z")
In total support of this proposal and the initial setup of things. Just wanted to mention a few things specific to Jupiter Lend (aka Fluid) and how few things need to be factored differently. ### Insights I think renaming **borrows\_limit\_in\_bps** to **allocation\_limit\_in\_bps** might be better and more precise. Jupiter Lend allows to set a few extra parameters, it has 3 parameters: - Loan to Value (LTV): The ratio/percent to which user can borrow, if set to 80% then it means user can borrow $80 for every $100. - Liquidation Threshold (LT): The ratio/percent at which user’s position becomes available for liquidation, if set to 86% then above 86% user’s position can be liquidated. - Liquidation Max Limit (LML): The ratio/percent at which user’s position becomes available for 100% liquidation, if set 92% then above 92% the position will be fully wiped off, kind of like giving 8% liquidation penalty bonus. Between LT to LML, liquidation only happens to LT, for example, if position becomes 88% then liquidation can at max move the position to LT, in this case 86% so not as much liquidation is require to liquidate making liquidation much more optimized. The goal is to keep Liquidation Penalty super low between LT & LML to minimize the liquidation losses for end users like in this case 1-2% Liquidation Penalty should be enough. Above LML, position will get fully liquidated to make sure protocol remains safe of bad debt. [This](https://fluid.guides.instadapp.io/vault-protocol/advanced-liquidation-mechanism/why-are-liquidations-in-fluid-100x-better) link should help understand the benefit of Jupiter\_Lend / Fluid’s liquidation. - **borrows\_limit\_in\_bps** : To start with 50% sounds good, however should easily be able to expand it to 70% or 80% as Jupiter Lend grows, USDC can be instantly withdrawn from Jupiter Lend to be made available for Jupiter Perps. - **liquidation\_fee\_bps** aka **Liquidation Penalty** : 2% to be conservative on launch. Later upgrade it to 1% when liquidation mechanism gets widely integrated across Solana ecosystem. Lastly, I think we should also have an analysis on SOL market and how it’s utilization reacts in different market conditions. SOL is the biggest market on Jupiter Perp with liquidity of $728M. Allocating SOL to Jupiter Lend to be used in JUPSOL-SOL looping strategy can be very beneficial and also add up nicely on fees & revenue. ---
**Author:** ![Whammy](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/user_avatar/discuss.jup.ag/whammy/32/9633_2.png) [@Whammy](https://discuss.jup.ag/u/Whammy)\ **Post date:** [June 7, 2025, 6:42am UTC](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/jlp-loan-initial-parameter-recommendations-and-yield-projections/38428/3 "2025-06-07T06:42:55Z")
@chaoslabs Honestly i like idea about create lending protocol Also its might could meet my proposal about [CAT FIRE NFT (Financially Independent Retired Early)](https://discuss.jup.ag/t/cat-fire-nft-financially-independent-retired-early/38578) ✨ Upgrade: Introduce Tokenized Gold as a Lending Asset or Collateral ✅ Option 1: Gold as a Yield-Bearing Collateral Allow users to stake tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) into the lending system. Use it to back stablecoin loans (USDC). Gold-backed loans = lower volatility risk than DeFi tokens. ✅ Option 2: “Gold-Boosted Borrowing” Incentive Layer Users who stake JUP or JLP + gold get lower borrow rates Adds incentive to lock value and reduces protocol default risk * * * 📈 Benefits Benefit Description 🛡 Risk Reduction Gold is less volatile than crypto collateral 💰 Real Yield Tokenized gold can earn yield in real-world markets 🔒 Capital Efficiency USDC-backed by gold = lower loan risk 🌐 Diversification Makes Jupiter a leader in RWA-integrated DeFi