JUP DAO Quorum Vote

Jupiter DAO
81

Yes, we should vote on it.

5 Likes
82

Not the more useful proposal but definitly needed to increase our credibility and show our adaptability as DAO

5 Likes
83

Thanks for the reply and providing more clarity ! Cheers :smile:

3 Likes
84

Sounds good :+1:. Lfgā€‹:sunglasses::fire:

4 Likes
85

Happy and wait to vote For.

4 Likes
86

Yep! Its a good idea.

4 Likes
87

This looks fine by me. Reflecting reality on ground is key in what ever decision is taking to move the jupiter ecosystem forward.

4 Likes
88

Would be interesting to increase the ammount needed to vote aswelā€¦

4 Likes
89

I can see the need to make this change,however, I believe that using percentage would be best for future votes as we will continue to grow. My vote is a yes.

5 Likes
90

Well, the breakdown is great

LFG Jupiter

5 Likes
91

Percentage of staked jup make sense, fixed number is meaningless.

7 Likes
92

It makes perfect senseā€¦I will definetly be voting for.
Growing the pie all together and being smart about it I love the Jupiter comunity.

3 Likes
93

This idea of quorum incensement is a right step in a right direction, I also believe that the populations that already staked will come to vote in each vote session to surpass the new required vote number.

5 Likes
94

I agree, in the future reevaluate these values ā€‹ā€‹according to the growth of Dao

5 Likes
95

@Slorg, have you and the team had a chance to review the feedback as you typically do? Thereā€™s strong support for this to be considered, particularly in relation to percentages. Has any thought been given to incorporating that feedback into tomorrowā€™s vote?

7 Likes
96

Love the idea.

However, with the amount of staked JUP almost guaranteed to increase each quarter, why donā€™t we do a percentage of the total instead of defining the 120m value? Would love to hear some arguments for both.

6 Likes
97

Thank you for standing up for the DAO #J4J. I hope the feedback is taken into consideration given the short notice that was given on this one to the voters. I fully support a decentralized approach based on the community feedback; whatā€™s the point of these discussions otherwise?

8 Likes
98

You welcome @Crypto_Minion! It makes a lot of sense and if it needs delaying the vote, itā€™s worth doing so just to consider the feedbacks so that the final proposal is comprehensive enough and this doesnā€™t get revisited over & over again.

10 Likes
99

Sounds good. Waiting to go faster than ever. Lfgā€¦

5 Likes
100

Hi bud, I think thatā€™s a good idea but at the same time using the threshold for now is a nice experiment to check the possible result or outcome of these changes in the DAO.

But Iā€™m curious what % you have in your mind if we want to use % of staked JUP instead of the threshold?

Last quarter thereā€™s around 350m staked JUP and for 4 proposals thereā€™s an average of 260m voted powers or around 75% of the total staked JUP.

4 Likes