The purpose of Jupuary is CEF (Community Eat First), it is to reward active users.
If you attend Planetary Calls, why don’t you have POAP?
If you love JUP, why don’t you use their products?
If you trust JUP, why don’t you hold JUPSol, JUP, JLP tokens?
All those questions are here to make Jupuary the best airdrop of Solana history, by that I mean fair for everybody who gets involve and believe in this community!
And last but not least, if we’re not using JUP Product for airdrops but because it’s good, easy and they built the best for Solana ecosystems.
I believe no way attendees who surely have up to 50 jup stake and watches the platenary call from start to ends will not wish to have the poap. It seems people who don’t get involved with platenary call are advocating that the poap shouldn’t be include as criteria or multiplier. Jupiverse believe in equality if you get involved you deserve to be rewarded once you meet up with the criteria.
Fully agree with your take! If you’re here, you’re here, period.
POAP is the best way to show you dedication towards JUP ecosystem and the entire team by supporting them every week during these calls and also be aware of what’s being done and planned for the future
I think we should really focus on getting JUP in hands of the newest people to get involved in the Jupiter ecosystem since the first airdrop. I think this is essential to growing the community. Its just a balance of getting it “actual” new users hands and making sure that long time supporters are allocated accordingly.
Very detailed and thought out, I agree with almost everything but I am also wondering how will you measure something so detailed and so big, like Twitter engagment with accuracy. It will be an challenge but interesting times lie ahead nevertheless and I am excited to be a part of history. J4J
I really appreciate the proposal and love the idea of rewarding those who engage with the ecosystem!
I have a question though—how would it work for users like me who use different wallets for different purposes? For instance, I have a dedicated hot wallet for trading, another wallet for staking and voting, and yet another wallet that holds my JLP. Would separating these activities across different wallets negatively affect my eligibility for multipliers and rewards, or would I still be able to benefit from the proposed system?
Each person that think they had some contribution on X regarding Jupiter and other platform will make submissions
Or there maybe a keyword Jupiter will check to pick those that had contributions
You will still be
My proposal doesn’t say that users must meet all criteria I listed to be eligible
There will be a base criteria - which all of youe wallet are likely going to meet ( since you are user and not just a farmer)
Got it, thanks for the clarification! Just to confirm—does it make a difference if we hold JLP in one wallet and vote in a separate wallet, compared to doing both in the same wallet? I’m wondering if the multipliers are calculated the same way regardless of which wallets are used, or if doing more activities in the same wallet leads to a higher combined multiplier.