exactly - very dissapointent in the price. All JUP value is going to JLP rathen then JUP token which is very unfair and frankly see no point in holding the token..
1 Like
So premisse, not an expert. but just logically thinking:
JUP Burning means away for ever and less Circulating.
A sell of JUP should be avoided to make pressure on price - so not changing in different assets
What if it stay just as a locked JUP Pool which belongs to all others Jup Holders according to their JUP holdings share.
Like lets say in a share Market the free Market JUP would be like shares with voting power, while the ones in the Pool would be just value keeping.
Would just be a Pool which purchases back more JUPs with its own earnings and no purpose just keeping and buying back through earnings from staking or whatever the JUP Holders would get as drops or % in the future.
On Market there would be no selling pressure from the pool itself, there would be a constant increase with the effect like burning as there should be no Plan on what to do with it just keeping and storing value, which is the asset of the free floating JUPs.
let’s say would be like a snowball system eating up itself with no purpose of earning but would decrease the free coins and increase the value of the free floating coins.
Was just idea while reading the different proposals.
But the Pool would increase in value by increasing it’s holding size, would backup the value of the free JUPs which would decrease in open market (once no new coming out) and so would decrease the free floating volume by increasing the backup value and having double effect on the value of the other coins.
1 Like
Implementing an annual burn equivalent to 4% of the circulating supply of the JUP token would represent an important strategic step toward strengthening the ecosystem. This policy creates a programmed deflation mechanism, gradually reducing the available supply and, consequently, generating a positive impact on the token’s value over time.
When this deflationary dynamic is combined with community-driven initiatives that expand the real utility of JUP — whether in governance, fee payments, incentives, or new protocol functionalities — we begin to build a virtuous cycle: lower supply + higher utility = higher demand, which exponentially enhances the token’s sustainable appreciation.
In summary, a consistent annual burn policy, aligned with decisions that reinforce JUP’s role as an essential asset within the ecosystem, can become one of the key pillars for generating long-term value for all community participants.
1 Like