This is so comprehensive. Thanks for sharing. It is important that we know that all cats matter. No one is more beneficial. We all contribute differently but do so all the same to the growth of the community.
2 Likes
I support the above proposal and would like to add that JUP is inclusive and that something very important to be added to its communication is: simultaneous translation in informative videos, rallies, jupuarys, presentations… so that those who are not so familiar with English but are good investors can follow everything and give their opinion! Let’s leave egos aside and be empathetic and inclusive!
3 Likes
Again my only complaint against the team is that they did not make their intentions with JUPUARY 2 clear months in advance. I really have not seen a single argument supporting how this was not something they could have done.
Instead waiting until after the proposed snapshot date to say well, we are thinking about switching things up
Is just more of the same that a lot of us have experienced in crypto. Rug vibes. Deflecting by saying we will have a vote, leave it up to the community.
The staking community ?
People need to understand that USERS are what defines a project
I fully agree, and the language used by the team and most certainly condoned in the discord and here feels only representative of a portion of its users. Arguably a portion that does not generate much to any actual revenue for the team.
By far one of the most active DAOS I have ever personally participated in, looking forward to seeing how this is handled by the team and voted on as a whole by everyone. Science is at work here.
3 Likes
Totally agree. With all the respect, this was a huge mistake and, horrible timing.
3 Likes
We should have skipped the first vote and gone straight to vote 3. 70 percent for a vote that was in their own words contentious lmao.
Glazers will glaze man. Hearing YouTube videos with phrases like “priced in” now is a small consolation.
2 Likes
This post really highlights the core values of Jup’s vision—community and inclusivity. At the same time, it’s worth considering how we balance fairness with rewarding those who actively contribute to the ecosystem in meaningful ways.
2 Likes
Wow wow wow! Anything supporting anti KYC, I’m there bro!!!
2 Likes
I can dig it! Much Love.
1 Like
No matter what happens with the airdrop some cats will be happy and some will not. You will never please everyone, its an impossible task. I just hope expectations don’t exceed reality…may the odds be forever in your favour and try to enjoy it whatever your allocation
4 Likes
That’s a very important reminder.
Not everyone will be happy, but the team are trying their best
3 Likes
Lochie, bro I love you! You’re one of the best (if not the best) cats out there. I follow you on X and I think you are a real asset, not only to the exchange but to Jupiverse.
However… I don’t think praising the team every other post will help in the long run.
It’s gone be ugly. It’s gonna be very ugly for Jup and for JLP.
The real numbers are horrible week after week. You guys can ignore all these facts but this won’t do any good to this project.
The DAO vote was rugged with a 70% threshold.
The number of traders are going down.
Fees collected are going down.
Perps volume is going down.
Sure… If we want Meow to like us and be part of the little family of the good cats, we can ignore everything I mentioned above.
If we want to succeed on the long run, we should call the spade a spade.
No hate… just an honest opinion.
3 Likes
I have to agree with this one,
also great writing, encouraging debate there, xD
2 Likes
swaps are still usage, real users, i dont care if they only swap 5 JUP. with no fees.
2 Likes
I totally get your view, but ask anyone I am defs not a yes men!
I’ve voted no to many WG’s and grants. I just give credit where credit is due.
I woudknt call this a rug. The idea is to keep MOST people happy. And I think 70% is most.
Ik people were hating on whales but they paid the price to vote.
Defs not true bro! JUP swaps increased 50 x from last year. We had 10m active wallets and it’s growing.
Idk if this is true or not but I’ll take your word.
I’m not concerned by this as long as income for the team is coming in (which it is). When bull peaks JLP fees will be insane. Also don’t forget , JUP has 150m $ in assets for safe keeping.
Also I’m not having a crack at you! I value your opinion and your concerns. I’m so glad someone actually looked into some of the flaws we have over here! I just hope they are short lived 
Appreciate you homie!
4 Likes
My man, as I said I love you. Do you think I would follow an yes man to X?
I know you are honest but I think sometimes you just try to please everyone.
Let me ask you this. What after Jupuary? Who’s gonna support the platform?
Another question… where the team income come from?
The problem is, the core value of Jupiter, the traders, has been pushed into a corner. These people are supporting the platform.
If you guys are marginzing these motherfuckers, you might be in for a surprise later on.
3 Likes
Nah that defs aint me i promise you that!
Depends what you mean after jupuary? Do you mean after this years on or the overall end of tokens being released? Im gonna presume you were referring to the latter.
Meow said that at catstanbul he will announce the long term utility of $JUP. I presume rev share may be involved, or maybe LFG platform 2.0 will be beast AF where we earn ASR through tokens launched on the platform. Maybe Jup i sbuilding more tokens? could we see $JUPAI ?
There is millions of possibilities.
Yes they are a core value to the jup ecosystem, but i dont agree its been pushed into the corner? We have 50x more swap volume compared to last year, swaps on JUP DEX using JUP Z are now gassless, the best rates and feeless. You legit couldnt ask for more. PERPS had limit order implemented the other day.
They are building so much each week.
2 Likes
Great idea.
Real treatment requires Big Trust