Allocate 50% of the 700M JUP tokens (350M JUP) for the January 2026 distribution to active stakers, with rewards distributed based on time-weighted staking duration
This initiative incentivizes long-term commitment, enhancing network stability and user engagement. By rewarding active stakers, Jupiter Exchange fosters loyalty, discourages short-term speculation, and strengthens community trust.
Aim: To boost staking participation, improve token retention, and align incentives for sustained ecosystem growth.
Benefit to Jupiter Exchange:Enhanced Liquidity: Increased staking reduces circulating supply, stabilizing token value.
Community Growth: Rewards attract and retain dedicated users, expanding the ecosystem.
Decentralization: Encourages broader participation, reinforcing network security.
Long-Term Value: Time-weighted rewards promote holding, supporting sustainable growth.
This allocation ensures Jupiter Exchange remains in alignment to it stakers.
Not a bad proposal though stakers contribute and show strength of support and dedication throughout the tough time as a community. Some percentages should go to some new products as well.
That suggestion doesnât make sense â Jupiterâs core business is the exchange (swaps, perps). Without the exchange, thereâs no Jupiter. Stakers donât drive the core operations; the team and infrastructure do. Giving 50% of âJupuaryâ to stakers would be like rewarding the board while ignoring the hundreds actually building and maintaining the platform.
Distributing 50% of JUP to stakers may seem like a major opportunity, but it risks creating imbalances in the system. For many users, the share they receive wonât feel fair or impactful small fragments that erode trust instead of building value. However, if these shares are pooled into operational groups of around 40 people, they become strategic capital for building tools, content, services, or internal governance within the Jupiter ecosystem.
These groups must be empowered to manage their allocations, either through personal initiatives or democratic voting systems, supported by Jupiterâs infrastructure. If a group succeeds in building value, the benefits both in terms of governance and financial upside belong to the group itself, not to the broader network. This ensures that those who actively contribute are the ones who directly benefit from what they create.
If the model is well-designed, profits stay with the builders, and Jupiter becomes increasingly attractive to investors and partners, thanks to a community that doesnât just receive but actively creates real value.
In summary, the 50 percent distribution can only succeed if it marks the beginning of an evolutionary governance model. It requires a structure that turns stakers into builders, where the value generated remains with those who created it. This way, Jupiter not only rewards commitment, it accelerates its expansion and strengthens investor confidence.
The stakers still play a huge part than anyone in the community, the only thing that bound the community together is $Jup token, people have lost big fortune holding it throughout this year with big loss, the only people who might be against it are the people whom sold off after the last jupnuary.
âGetting Greedyâ while you sold off after last jupnuary and you even calling for 2cent after you sold off and youâre now calling me greedy because I hold through the difficult time and still stick to jupDao community idealogy. Itâs just a proposal donât get too emotional. As a huge stakers we deserved more allocation than any new products this is not the time to grow the pie but to support real jup stakers because large number of community dumb on us and still fuding the Jupiter token.
This is not a passive pool that distributes fees. It is an operational pool, where tokens are aggregated to build value. Gains are not guaranteedthey depend entirely on the success of the groupâs initiatives. The pool earns only if the group creates something that generates value: tools, services, content, governance, automations, and more. So the poolâs earnings are the result of productive activity, not automatic yield. If the group builds something useful, it can generate returns. But there is no passive income only value produced and retained by those who created it.
i understand you bro, if possible i want back my losses too
i know i will get my losses back, but not in short term. short term thinking was one of the reasons i lost money. now i think on the long side, my losses will come back and i will get even more
A 50% stake might seem greedy at first glance, but for investors or those with real stakes, itâs a good idea. Some staked their last yearâs allocation until now, and some stake with their purchased Jup. But to prevent massive dumb of token the idea is less favorable
Maybe the post is missing an important explanation on how to execute the 50%, which is a very large portion and it doesnât have to be fully focused only toward stakers. We can allocate a meaningful part to âcarrotsâ like last Jupuary to encourage holding while incentivizing users. That could lead to better price action.
This also depends on how the current carrots are going to be used whether in the same way they were originally promised, or with more restrictions. If structured properly, that should lead to more balanced distribution and more organic growth.
