JUP DAO Contributors' Mega Guide

This guide encompasses all guidance issued pertaining to various items such as Workgroups, Grant Groups, and Votes.

Every grantee, WG, and aspiring WG should read this entire guide, and also know that every item listed is not set in stone — but this is rather a living document of actionable advice.

Table of Contents:

Type Section Description
WG Resources Expectations & Standards A list of accountability and WG management guidance
WG Info Services which other WGs and Grant groups can provide to you
Revenue guidelines Guidelines for handling incidental and additional revenue sources for WGs
Grant Group Resources Applying for a grant The process to Apply for a DAO Grant or an Uplink Grant
Trial prep sheet Advice for Grant Recipients who desire to become a Trial WG
Uplink Grantee Expectations What is expected of someone who receives an Uplink Grant
Proposal format A suggested format for Trial and Full WG proposals
Case Studies J&J Case studies on each of the 3 Trial workgroups: J&J, Devrel, and Design.
Devrel
Design
Other Vote SOP Guide A guide on how the vote process should be rolled out
Propagating Info How to best get information out about your WG and its accomplishments

Read the full guide here: JupDAO Contributors Doc - Google Docs

20 Likes

This is awesome. Read it in full.

This should answer a lot of questions people have about voting process and answer why or why not their grant passed.

If any upcoming grantees have questions about the application process or experience feel free to reach out to me ! I’m happy to help

3 Likes

Appreciate the write up! Just finished reading it. Love the guidelines, much needed. :raising_hands:t4:

3 Likes

This is really awesome.

Find it satisfying. JUP is home

3 Likes

Thanks for the detailed guide @AG42

A few transparency questions that would be helpful to address in the guide:

CoC Members: Could you list the current CoC committee members?

Vote Records: Are CoC grant voting decisions viewable by the JUP community?

Quarterly Reports: Are these reports accessible to the broader JUP community?

Ultimately up to you guys whether or not to include this but it would enhance transparency and community engagement within the JUP DAO grants program.

2 Likes

Hi Matto! Thank you for the suggestions! I’d like to provide a few clarifications.

Any Cat of Culture can participate in the grants discussion and voting process. I’m not quite sure if the list of Cats of Culture is available outside of Discord, but we’ll discuss it with Catdets Work Group.

All the vote records are available at JUP Catdets, but again, this is CAWG’s domain, so I am not sure about visibility settings. Will be discussed.

Yep, all CWG Quarterly Reports are available here:

Again, thanks a lot for the suggestions! Added them to the backlog for the next interation.

3 Likes

I’m already working on a complete French adaptation.

3 Likes

This is informative.

2 Likes

I fully support the JUP DAO Contributors’ Mega Guide proposal. This comprehensive guide is a vital resource for WGs, Grant Groups, and aspiring contributors, providing clear guidance on expectations, processes, and best practices. It streamlines key areas like grant applications, proposal formats, and voting procedures, fostering transparency and fairness in DAO governance. The case studies on J&J, Devrel, and Design offer valuable insights, while sections on collaboration and revenue guidelines strengthen community ties.

To enhance its impact, I suggest establishing a process for regular updates to keep the guide relevant and hosting it directly on the Jupiter platform for easier access. Adding performance metrics for WGs could also improve accountability. Overall, this guide will empower contributors, drive ecosystem growth, and boost $JUP’s value, benefiting the entire Jupiverse.

1 Like