This guide encompasses all guidance issued pertaining to various items such as Workgroups, Grant Groups, and Votes.
Every grantee, WG, and aspiring WG should read this entire guide, and also know that every item listed is not set in stone — but this is rather a living document of actionable advice.
Table of Contents:
Type
Section
Description
WG Resources
Expectations & Standards
A list of accountability and WG management guidance
WG Info
Services which other WGs and Grant groups can provide to you
Revenue guidelines
Guidelines for handling incidental and additional revenue sources for WGs
Grant Group Resources
Applying for a grant
The process to Apply for a DAO Grant or an Uplink Grant
Trial prep sheet
Advice for Grant Recipients who desire to become a Trial WG
Uplink Grantee Expectations
What is expected of someone who receives an Uplink Grant
Proposal format
A suggested format for Trial and Full WG proposals
Case Studies
J&J
Case studies on each of the 3 Trial workgroups: J&J, Devrel, and Design.
Devrel
Design
Other
Vote SOP Guide
A guide on how the vote process should be rolled out
Propagating Info
How to best get information out about your WG and its accomplishments
Hi Matto! Thank you for the suggestions! I’d like to provide a few clarifications.
Any Cat of Culture can participate in the grants discussion and voting process. I’m not quite sure if the list of Cats of Culture is available outside of Discord, but we’ll discuss it with Catdets Work Group.
All the vote records are available at JUP Catdets, but again, this is CAWG’s domain, so I am not sure about visibility settings. Will be discussed.
Yep, all CWG Quarterly Reports are available here:
Again, thanks a lot for the suggestions! Added them to the backlog for the next interation.
I fully support the JUP DAO Contributors’ Mega Guide proposal. This comprehensive guide is a vital resource for WGs, Grant Groups, and aspiring contributors, providing clear guidance on expectations, processes, and best practices. It streamlines key areas like grant applications, proposal formats, and voting procedures, fostering transparency and fairness in DAO governance. The case studies on J&J, Devrel, and Design offer valuable insights, while sections on collaboration and revenue guidelines strengthen community ties.
To enhance its impact, I suggest establishing a process for regular updates to keep the guide relevant and hosting it directly on the Jupiter platform for easier access. Adding performance metrics for WGs could also improve accountability. Overall, this guide will empower contributors, drive ecosystem growth, and boost $JUP’s value, benefiting the entire Jupiverse.