I’ve read the @iSAK draft proposal
in its entirety :
I’d like to share my thoughts both as one of the coordinators of the Jupiter Regional collective since its formation in October 2024, and as the lead of the francophone initiative (January 2024 in Jupiter Discord, JUP FR account on X since August 2024).
A Shared Vision for Regionals
The proposal opens with the intent to create a shared framework for all regional initiatives, assuming there is a common foundation upon which any of them can grow. As we know, that foundation must include the ability to consistently deliver quality content on social platforms or in real-world events, and above all, to offer continuous support to anyone trying to understand what Jupiter is.
That means: being able to provide accurate, transparent, and accessible answers at any time, in any language. Because we are Jupiter Regionals. And we believe that every new user should be able to speak to someone knowledgeable in their own language, someone who truly embodies the values of the DAO.
The Role of the Jupiter Regional Collective
The draft has been shared with the Jupiter Regional collective, nearly 60 members strong, including leaders, regional team members, and JWG contributors. It gives those most directly involved the chance to take part in this important conversation and to help shape the proposal in progress.
Since its inception, the Regional collective has aimed to facilitate collaboration between regional actors, providing an open space where grantees and WGs can easily plug in and involve local initiatives, as we’ve already done with JJWG and DAWG.
I maintain a publicly accessible directory of regional contacts🔗, categorized by ISO language code (which also functions as a Discord role). This tool helps any DAO member to connect newcomers with the most relevant ambassador for onboarding, based on language and region (https://jupgeo.com). @ALLEYCAT
jupiter regional - Google Sheets
From Rejection to Resilience
It’s worth remembering: the Jupiter Regional collective once submitted a grant proposal (Introducing the Regional Jupiter Initiative) that led to a mentorship session with the CWG, but was ultimately dismissed without further follow-up.
No explanation was required, of course, but in retrospect, our proposal was likely seen as too ambitious for our early stage at the time. Despite unanimous community support in the comments, it never reached a vote.
Still, we kept going, each of us with limited means, but united in purpose. Because it’s not enough for Jupiter to open to the world, the world must also open to Jupiter. And that is the work of regional ambassadors.
We are still here. Five of the six original contributors to that first proposal remain active. Our family has grown stronger. Our analysis back then was sound. The DAO wasn’t ready yet. But things are changing, because we’ve stayed consistent and committed.
from left to right: @Toddlernft , @Iamme, @Vengefuldemon , @B00ku , @Chaman
On the Proposed Four-Tier Framework
Let’s now examine the proposed structure point-by-point.
1. Trial Initiatives
The original Regional OGs already fulfilled the goals of this tier without any external funding. The creation of our collective enabled new ambassadors to receive structured feedback and support, thanks to the organic mentorship offered by experienced members.
This is how the coordinator role emerged, to connect early-stage contributors with those further along, creating a strong, respectful culture of mutual support and shared identity.
The CAWG is already aware that the Regional collective is willing to support this trial phase as a preliminary onboarding filter before potential grantees reach the next funding step (Jupiter Regional Ambassadors Collective).
At this point, our members are well-equipped to assess content quality on X/Twitter and Discord. In fact, some of our senior members could themselves mentor trial initiatives, with clear objectives:
• Ensure a visible and accessible presence on Discord and X (daily availability minimum).
• Master the official Jupiter FAQ in the target language and publish at least one thread for each product/DAO mechanism (e.g., as I did with over 60 illustrated threads). Onboarding Support for Regional Integration
• Share these publications with the regional lead for review, or the collective, if no lead exists yet.
• Collaborate actively with others in the same language group when applicable.
This approach ensures clarity and accountability from the start. Publishing only from a personal account, without affiliating with the larger initiative, could not be grounds for budget support (except grant system). Those who engage with the collective could be eligible based on contribution and alignment. “PPP or alone”
Rather than fix a rigid three-month time frame, I suggest allowing ambassadors to progress at their own pace, based on skill acquisition and community feedback, with regard to the 4 objectives I mentioned above. 
Legitimacy should be earned through action, not the calendar.
2. Grantee Initiatives
The current $750 grant from the CAWG is insufficient for some regions due to cost-of-living disparities. In Western Europe, for instance, this budget barely covers the monthly income of a part-time intern, let alone two core contributors in France, which is the case for the FR initiative.
In our situation, this budget has to:
• Cover two contributors,
• Support tool costs,
• Allocate funds for giveaways and community incentives.
If the DAO doesn’t intend to offer “charity,” then this amount doesn’t meet the standard for professional work either.
On the other hand, $750 is appropriate for onboarding a trainee, helping them master the team’s tool stack and content production process. But even here, we raise key questions:
• Could new contributors be required to attend the DAWG bootcamp? @adedamolajoke
• Can we structure mentorship sessions (@Kemosabe, Cloudz, Fabiano & Jussy : Thread University 
) like a bootcamp, to help non-English-speaking new ambassadors improve their skills?
For new regions with no prior affiliation, moving from trial to funded within 3 months is encouraging, but the path must be flexible and inclusive.
3. Part-Time Initiatives
In practice, trial and grantee initiatives already require full-time commitment, especially when the initiative is driven by one or two people.
This “part-time” tier should therefore be seen as a budget increase to reinforce and consolidate what was already built over the first six months.
IRL events involve additional logistics and costs. Without appropriate funding, teams can only provide communication and coverage, not presence. For the first two JUP BBQs organized by @Adel in the francophone region: grants were requested, but no clear response was received.
@julianhzhu recently asked for a document clarifying the JUP BBQ event concept (now in progress), and the CAWG has created a pathway for post-event reimbursement if specific documentation is provided. JUP Regional Events Post-Event Follow-up
At this stage, insufficient funding becomes a deterrent when it should be an enabler.
4. Full-Time Initiatives
The terms “part-time” and “full-time” don’t really reflect the reality of regional work. Full commitment starts on day one, especially for an initiative that starts from scratch.
This final tier overlaps with what we already understand as a DAO work group, annual budget, long-term planning, solid track record. At this point, the initiative can become a case study for the DAO’s Mega Guide. JUP DAO Contributors' Mega Guide
On the Three Structural Models
The proposal outlines three types of initiatives: regional, linguistic, and hybrid. These categories were already debated in our collective, particularly in relation to DAWG’s visual identity work for regional logos.
I won’t repeat the details here, my thread on X summarizes it, but that conversation was a good example of how cross-regional clarity can lead to quick consensus when everyone acts in good faith.
On Bilingual Leadership
It’s worth noting that regional leadership can be shared, one member may handle English-speaking calls, while the other focuses on the local language. Written communication is increasingly handled smoothly by advanced translation tools, so this split model is both realistic and effective.
Final Thoughts & Recommendations
The draft proposal is an important step forward, but it must be co-authored with those who live and build the regional experience daily. Here’s my summary:
→ What works well:
• Organic mentorship and onboarding already exist.
• A clear sense of PPP and shared purpose.
• Active public directories and open resources.
→ What needs improvement:
• The process for integrating new contributors into an existing initiative is unclear.
• Flat grants do not account for economic disparities.
→ What I recommend:
1. Adjust grants based on regional costs of living.
2. Subsidize small regular contributors transition to existing initiatives.
3. Promote shared leadership models
Recognition of International Discord Moderators as Regional Oversight Committee
I propose that the international moderators of the Jupiter Discord be officially recognized as the Regional Oversight Committee under the core CAWG, tasked with guiding DAO members who wish to engage in regional initiatives.
This group already possesses the skills, experience, and resources necessary to provide quality onboarding and mentorship, from first contact up to the grant application stage supported by core CAWG.
Their involvement in the evaluation and progression of regional initiatives, alongside the four core CAWG members, places them in a position of increased responsibility compared to other initiative contributors.
As such, this additional coordination role should be considered for monthly compensation, equivalent to that of a standard moderator role ($500/month), and independent from any other grants they may manage (such as those used to fund community development: giveaways, contests, IRL events, etc.).
A Final Word
Jupiter is reaching a pivotal moment in its community governance. This proposal opens a door, but the future of our regional architecture must be shaped with us, not just for us.
Regional initiatives are not “extras.”
They are the front lines of adoption.