Suggestion: Involve $JUP Stakers in the Marketing Campaigns of Jupiter Products

Proposals
1

Idea: Give $JUP Stakers Their Own Invite Rewards Pool for Marketing Campaigns of Jupiter Products

• $JUP stakers can claim a dedicated invite rewards allocation for each marketing campaign
• Allocation (size of rewards pool / number of invites) is tiered based on time-weighted $JUP stake
• Invited person can claim reward from the $JUP Staker dedicated reward pool (e.g. 50 USDC after the invited user completes Jupiter Academy or any other marketing campaign)
• This pool is separate from the public rewards pool (which is expected to be used up quickly)

Why?

• Public rewards can get exhausted quickly (by both legitimate and low-quality users)
• Gives $JUP stakers the resources to actively bring in real users and help grow the Jupiverse (acting as ambassadors)
• Encourages higher-quality onboarding through trusted participants
• Adds real utility to staking — $JUP stakers become active distributors of growth for Jupiter

Insights

• These incentives can act as an improved version of public reward pools
• $JUP stakers must actively claim their reward allocation — inactive stakers may leave allocations unclaimed (similar to ASR dynamics)

• Example:
A user permanently staking 50,000 $JUP could receive a $500 invite rewards pool, equivalent to onboarding 10 users (at $50 per invite reward)

2

I think this is a good idea, I just don’t want it to be rewarded.

Instead I think JUP stakers could be given the opportunity to give feedback on proposed marketing campaigns. They are a very engaged group and you can weight that feedback on staking amount.

But no rewards. It will encourage spam engagement (as rewards often do)

1 Like
3

It’s more about giving $JUP stakers the ability to act as ambassadors and reward newly onboarded users.

Personally, I want to onboard people, but there needs to be a real benefit / incentive for them to even try. Having a rewards pool allocation makes that possible for me.

4

Nah, it’ll just be spam2earn as always. If someone isn’t going to participate unless they’re paid then their feedback is likely worthless. And the people getting the feedback are going to feel ripped off. You need to prove there is value in the idea first then you can think about maybe incentivising it to scale

5

Who said anything about feedback? We’re onboarding people to use products, not asking them for comments.

They try it for the rewards and they stay if they actually like the product. It’s called acquisition cost.